Recent remarks by Pope Francis have revived an age-old
discussion about capitalism: what it is, how it works, the role it plays in our
lives and the role it ought to play. I’ve
read quite a few of these op-ed-type pieces, and it seems to me they all have
one thing in common. They all misconstrue what capitalism is, and therefore
misjudge its value.
It’s common to associate “capitalist” with words such as
greedy, rapacious, and ruthless. None of these qualities are intrinsic to
capitalism, of course. A capitalist enterprise is one in which individuals finance
an activity through which they hope to profit in the future. Many things can go
wrong with such an arrangement, of course—as Antonio in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice finds out, to
take an example at random.
Investors can be swindled, ships can sink, a market
can evaporate, anticipated profits might not pan out. The future is always
uncertain, which suggests that two qualities intrinsic to capitalism are faith
and trust.
I love capitalism, and I marvel at it sometimes when
watching a freight train boom across the countryside (building a network of
rail lines isn’t cheap or easy) or reflecting on a medical device that required
years of expensive research but, once perfected, now saves the lives of many. Though
our notions of capitalism, both good and bad, tend to focus on the industrial
age in which we live, we shouldn’t forget that the silk merchants we read about
in the Arabian Nights were also
capitalists.
I would even go so far as to suggest that all economic activity is capitalistic.
Even a homesteader needs capital in the form of land, seeds, and livestock, in
order to prosper. And this farmer, like any capitalist, needs to increase his capital—he needs to have
something left over—because that’s what he and his family are going to be
living on.
But there’s a lot more to life than economics. And
capitalist enterprises tend to disproportionally benefit those who already have
quite a bit of capital. This may have been what Pope Francis was talking about
when he remarked recently: “Some people continue to defend trickle-down
theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will
inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the
world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a
crude and naive trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in
the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system.”
Religious institutions have traditionally made an attempt to
redress the balance. In modern times this same role has largely been taken up
by government agencies. And more power to them.
I love big government. Call me a socialist if you want, why
not? But it seems to me that in the same way all economic life is capitalistic,
all government functions are socialistic. The local fire department is financed
by the entire community, after all, though only a few households benefit. Come
to think of it, Hilary and I have been financing the local schools for decades though
we don’t have kids. That’s how government is supposed to work and I’m all in
favor of it.
Another thing government does, or is supposed to do, is
regulate economic activity in an effort to minimize fraud, reckless leveraging
of assets, exploitative labor practices, and environmental degradation. They
should do more. Their efforts are blunted somewhat by the fact that the
interests they’re fighting against have loads of cash and an individualistic, “me
first” ideology that appeals to many voters.
But when Pope Francis casts aspersions on “the prevailing
economic system,” it makes me nervous. Foremost in his mind, I imagine, are the
staggering levels of youth unemployment in Europe today. But surely capitalism
itself isn’t at fault. The economic system of which the Pope speaks is shaped
by laws and institutions that have failed to live up to their regulatory duties,
blinded by glib economists and fearful of precipitating a “slow-down.”
I suppose it's a little more complicated than that. Meanwhile, there’s a lot to be said for stepping off the
consumerist merry-go-round of snowmobiles and personal devices altogether. The romance of the next new product leads nowhere in the end...
It’s
snowing. Time to get out those cross-country skis! And tonight? How about streaming Al Pacino and Jeremy Irons
in The Merchant of Venice?
No comments:
Post a Comment