A day does not go by when someone new doesn’t weigh in on the merits and defects of Christopher Nolan’s new film-version of The Odyssey, or tries to convince us which of the translations of Homer’s epic poem is really the best, or what the film tells us about the film industry, or our own society.
I saw it today. Didn’t like it much. It’s pretty grim. What
is lacks isn’t the gods, or the swashbuckling heroism, or the eroticism of the
original. It lacks the poetry.
Sea-faring films used to be good at that kind of thing. As a
kid I was mesmerized by the romance of such matinee fodder as Jason and the
Argonauts and The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad. I will admit that most of the
films we watched in those bygone days on the afternoon TV program called Epic
Theater didn’t reach that high standard. Many of them were made in Italy and poorly
dubbed, which gave them a slightly creepy tone. But they also conveyed a sense
of the open sea and a sort of corny nobility, by Zeus!
Nolan’s Odyssey does not. The soundtrack is too loud, the screen overfull of commotion. The flashbacks are sometimes so brief as to be all but incomprehensible. And Matt Damon doesn’t seem at all like the wily Odysseus, fated by the gods to endure a seemingly endless string of calamities before they allow him to return home.
But the key point is this: in Homer’s original the barbarous
elements in the story are counterbalanced by the beauty of the language and the
lofty—if sometimes repetitive—tone of the narrative. To take one of countless
examples:
At evening came the shepherd with his
flock,
his woolly flock. The rams as well,
this time,
entered the cave: by some sheep-herding
whim—
or a god’s bidding—none were left
outside.
He hefted his great boulder into place
and sat him down to milk the bleating
ewes
in proper order, put the lambs to suck,
and swiftly ran through all his evening
chores.
It seems like a bucolic scene, but of course we know better.
The shepherd is Polyphemus, the one-eyed monster.
Then he caught two more men and feasted
on them.
The tone doesn’t change. It’s all part of the narrative flow.
My moment was at hand, and I went
forward
holding an ivy bowl of my dark drink,
looking up, saying:
‘Kyklops, try some
wine.
Here’s liquor to wash down your scraps
of men.
The Odyssey is riddled with such juxtapositions,
but it’s a difficult trick to pull off on the screen. Nearly impossible. Nolan abandons the poetic
element altogether.
A few years ago. I took up The Odyssey again. I couldn’t
find my mass-market Fitzgerald translation, but had a copy of the Fagles
translation near at hand—a gift from a friend—and decided to give it a try. I
made it halfway through, but it was a struggle. I felt there was some
indefinable element missing in the tone. Gravity? Humor? Freshness?
Naturally a hubbub arose about various translations with the release
of the film—Lattimore, Fitzgerald, Fagles, Wilson, Mendelsohn, and another new
one coming out soon. I felt the need to revisit my old friend and bought a
reissue of Fitzgerald’s version in trade paperback. It was cheaper than two
tickets to the film.
I’m glad I did.
Which reminds me of an old joke: What did the goat say after he ate a can of film? He liked the book better.
































