I was surprised to see Austerlitz (8), a novel-essay-whatnot by W. G. Sebald, in the top ten. I own that book, but haven't read it. I have read Sebald's previous books, Vertigo (my favorite), The Rings of Saturn, and The Emigrants, all of which I enjoyed, though I enjoyed each one a little less than the one before.
I started to read Joan Didion's Year of Magical Thinking (12) but found myself strangely unmoved. And I seem to recall that many of my friends read Correction (5) to the end with grim fascination, then admitted that they hated it.
At a certain point, as I scrolled through the list, drawing mostly blanks, I began to wonder if I'd actually read any books published after the year 2000. Of course I have. Here are some of my favorites:
Borges and Me / Jay Parini (2020)
The Round House / Louise Erdrich (2012)
Catharsis: On the Art of Medicine / Andrzej Szczeklik (2005)
The Weil Conjectures: On Math and the Pursuit of the Unknown / Karen Olsson (2019)
Literature and the Gods / Roberto Calasso (2001)
The Fruit Thief / Peter Handke (2022)
Out Stealing Horses / Per Petterson (2003)
Dept. of Speculation / Jenny Offill (2014)
The White Road: Journey into an Obsession / Edmund de Wall (2015)
Beyond Sleep / Willem Frederik Hermans (translated from the Dutch in 2007)
Netherland / Joseph O'Neill (2008)
Philosopher of the Heart: the Restless Life of Soren Kierkegaard / Clare Carlisle (2019)
The Fly Trap / Fredrik Sjōberg (2014)
The Last Days of Roger Federer / Geoff Dyer (2022)
Normal People / Sally Rooney (2018)
In Search of Zarathustra / Paul Kriwaczek (2003)
Paris to the Moon / Adam Gopnik (2000)
A Gentleman in Moscow / Amir Towles (2016)
I'm not suggesting these books are among the best of the era; I'm in no position to judge, dilatory reader that I am. All I'm saying is that they stick in memory as good enough to mention.
From the Times list I extracted the names of an essayist unfamiliar to me, Elisa Gabbert, and a "philosophical" novelist, Rachel Cusk, and put in requests at the library for The Unreality of Memory and Outline.
I also found it interesting to investigate the individual picks of selected judges, where I sometimes came upon books I liked that didn't make the consolidated list (e.g. Netherland) and also spotted titles I want to check out that I'd never heard of (e.g. Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched The World, by Deirdre McCloskey. )
One final aspect of the article is worth mentioning: the graphics. (See above.) The editors separate the finalists into groups of twenty, and often make use of well-worn and sometimes shabby paperbacks for the group shots, rather than the pristine hardcovers we see in the individual listings.
It's always a pleasure to peruse a shelf of someone else's books. Or your own.
1 comment:
The Times list is a good conversation starter. I like your idea of creating one's own list; on yours I find many intriguing titles. But "Normal People?" What did you like about that novel? The NY Times has a newsletter (and Magazine feature) called "Read Like The Wind" that recommends older, sometimes forgotten, works. Perhaps you subscribe. Many of the photos in that newsletter are of well-loved (i.e. tattered) books.
Post a Comment