The Green Book is a winner, and it's hard to imagine anyone
not enjoying it. (Yet some people haven't, and perhaps there are good reasons why.) It's well crafted, like
the best comedies from Hollywood's golden age, and to describe it as
cliché-ridden is like saying the Comedia del Arte is full of stock characters
or that the sonata form repeats a lot. What else is new? The question is, what
is being made of those patterns, those materials?
The basic formula is easy to describe: Tony, a brusque
Italian-American bouncer (Viggo Mortenson) from the Bronx, temporarily
unemployed, takes a job driving Doc (Mahershala Ali), a talented and effete
black pianist who lives in an apartment in Carnegie Hall, on a concert tour
through the South.
Tony lives in a world of ethnic and cultural stereotypes,
like most people of that era, but he's actually a fairly nice guy. He also has
a reputation for being able to "handle" trouble, which is why he got
the job. Doc knows there's going to be trouble during the tour. According to
his band mates, that's one of the reasons he decided to undertake it.
The film largely consists of a series of conversations
between this "odd couple" punctuated by incidents in which they
encounter difficulties—some the result of deeply engrained attitudes of the
Deep South, others largely self-generated.
The dialog is often funny, but it's also touching in many
places. Doc tries to get Tony to improve his diction and helps him write love
letters home to his wife; Frank introduces Doc to Little Richard and tries to
get him to eat a piece of fried chicken. At one point he exclaims, "Doc,
I'm more black than you!" No, Doc corrects him stiffly, you're not.
The film doesn't offer any sweeping vision or formula for
the future of race relations. Then again, as far as I can recall, neither did Trading Places, Silver Streak, or Rush Hour II. But in describing it as a
comedy, I don't mean to suggest it doesn't explore some very ugly corners of
the American scene. The genius in the film lies in the success with which the
main characters, who would be very unlikely to associate under normal
circumstances, develop a grudging fondness for each other, working their way
through the clichés to make contact with deeper veins of personal character.
Shoplifters
We don't often get a good look at the underbelly of Japanese
life, where men and women form unusual living arrangements and scam the
government in order to get by. In Shoplifters
we meet up with a disparate group of individuals living in a two-room
apartment. Granny is a cagey old coot, though it's not clear who's grandma she
is. The "man of the house," Osamu, has a job as a day-laborer but
spends quite a bit of time shoplifting with a boy named Shota who lives with
the family. The "mother," Nobuyo, works at an industrial laundry, and
a younger woman named Aki also occupies some space.
Though their situation may be dire, especially after Osamu injures
his foot at a construction site, the tone of the film tends to be light. Osama
is a puckish character, they've got sources of revenue, food on the table, and
a roof over their heads. Things get more complicated when Osamu and Shota come
upon a little girl named Juri—not for the first time—who's being neglected and
perhaps physically abused by her parents, and decide to bring her home. It's
one more mouth to feed, but when it comes down to it, they find that they can't
send her back to a life more miserable than their own. "It's not
kidnapping if you don't ask for ransom. Right? And we're not holding her
against her will."
Much of the film consists of a series of random episodes
during which we develop a better picture of who's related to whom, and how. But
that's not the important point. The big question is, how are these kids (both
Juri and Shota) going to handle such issues as parental neglect and crime, once
the public authorities get their hands on them. All of the characters linger in
memory long after the movie is over, but the underlying themes are pretty
obvious: giving birth to a child doesn't automatically make you a mother, and
social workers often don't have a clue. It's a touching tale worthy of Yasijurō
Ozu thematically, if not stylistically, which may explain why Shoplifters won the Palme d'Or at Cannes
last year.
Happy as Lazzaro
Several extended families of farm workers keep a tobacco
farm going in a poverty-stricken region of southern Italy. Their landlords have
somehow neglected to let them know that share-cropping has been illegal for a
half-century. It's a tough life, the kids don't go to school, but it's all
they've known.
A bright spot is provided by
Lazzaro, a seemingly naive lad who enjoys helping out, doing more than
his share of the work, brightening the mood. The other workers depend on him,
and take advantage of him.
When the landowners arrive for a visit and to settle
accounts, their son Tancredi takes a liking to Lazzaro, and the two develop a
peculiar quasi-friendship. In a sequence of events too complicated to describe,
the authorities are called to the scene and put an end to the peasants' virtual
enslavement.
But that's only half the story. I'm not going to describe
how these people's lives play themselves out in the city, but it reminded me
more than once of John Berger's trilogy, Into
Their Labors. And that's quite a compliment.
Zama
Set at a remote coastal trading outpost in eighteenth-century
Argentina, Zama is rich in historical
detail and local color, but also dolorous, claustrophobic, and slightly deranged.
The narrative, such as it is, hangs by a thread on Corregidor Don Diego de Zama's
eagerness for orders from Spain to arrive, transferring him to a new post. He's
the local justice, but his rulings are few and far between. Zama has lingering
respect, but not much authority.
Meanwhile, he longs for news from his wife and children and
is disturbed by his growing interest in the native women. He seems to have few
friends or even allies in the village—which we never actually see with any degree of
perspective. The first half of the film is a growing litany of frustrations,
misunderstandings, and disappointments, all of which highlight the man's
isolation and diminishing sense of self worth.
Why would we want to follow along on this trail of tears?
Well, why read Becket? Or Bouvard et
Pécuchet? Aren't you interested in the underside of colonial life? After
all, this could be Grand Portage, or Fort Bent. The natives are here and there,
servants, you see them looking at you, subservient ... for now.
The trouble is, in a hierarchical society, when everything
trickles down from the top, it's hard to make a break and do things on your own
initiative. Zama finally decides to sign up for a hare-brained expedition into
the back country in search of a notorious bandit. Finally we get to see a bit
of the countryside. We get to meet the natives. But in the end, this turns out
not to have been a good idea.
“I wish it wasn’t so rough for the audience, but there are
some ways that can be beneficial,” director Lucretia Martel says. “Anything that causes you to move
out of predictability is not comfortable. It’s meant to be disturbing.”
No comments:
Post a Comment