We attended a Harvest-fest in the town of Finland,
Minnesota, the other day. I don't know what they harvest up there in the woods,
and the local band didn't even include an accordion!
Returning home, I found myself briefly immersed in Swedish
culture.
A Man Called Ove,
a new film by Hannes Holm based on the (Swedish) best-seller by Fredrik Backman,
tells the tale of an aged grouch at a
residential development who is no longer the manager but can't resist
criticizing everyone for slight infractions of the compound's rules. His demeanor
is dour and his comments are abrasive. Nobody likes him and we don't either. The
film is littered with minor domestic incidents, serious accidents, touching
moments, a few attempted suicides, and a house fire or two, during which we get
to know some of his neighbors at the housing development, and especially an Iranian
woman named Parvaneh who blithely ignores his gruff exterior and soon has him
babysitting her two young children. We also learn about his long-time friend
Rune, with whom Ove had a dispute years earlier that turned into a serious rift.
You see, Ove will only drive a Saab, while Rune prefers a Volvo. Interspersed
with these episodic scenes are a series of lengthy flashbacks during which we
learn something about Ove's early life, and especially how he met his
remarkably charming wife Sonja (recently deceased).
It all adds up to an attractive, well-fashioned tale about a
fairly unattractive man. He doesn't have a heart of gold, but as it turns out, he
does, at least, have a heart.
Hannes Holm was in attendance at the screening, and he said
a few words after the film. "I've been hearing about Minnesota since I was
a boy," he said at one point, "and now I've finally got here."
He also mentioned that A
Man Called Ove ranks as the third-highest grossing Swedish-language film in
history.
After the screening I ran into Holm sitting with Susan Smoluchowski and a gentleman in a suit from the American Swedish Institute at a table in front of Pracna on Main and I couldn't help butting in to ask him what the two top-ranking films might be.
After the screening I ran into Holm sitting with Susan Smoluchowski and a gentleman in a suit from the American Swedish Institute at a table in front of Pracna on Main and I couldn't help butting in to ask him what the two top-ranking films might be.
"Fanny and
Alexander?" No.
"My Life as a Dog?"
No.
"Sven Klang's
Combo?" NO. But he couldn't remember. I later determined that The
100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed out a Window is tops. But that's as far as I got.
In The Invoice,
Swedish novelist Jonas Karlsson presents us with a fable along the lines of
Patrick Suskind's The Pigeon and
Julien Barnes's The Hedgehog, namely,
a short book with a short title and a single guiding concept. Karlsson tries to
imagine what it would be like if everyone were billed by an international
organization on the basis of the quality of their experiences, rather than
their income, with the revenue redistributed to victims of floods, earthquakes,
civil disorder, disease, and so on.
The nameless protagonist, whom we'll call Ingvar, is a young
single male who lives alone, works part-time in a video shop, and spends his
evenings eating take-out food and watching films. His only friend, Roger, stops
in at the video store from time to time to help him eat his lunch, but otherwise
offers little in the way of conversation or companionship. When Ingvar receives
his "bill," he tosses it into the trash. He hasn't paid much
attention to the publicity surrounding the government initiative and the sum is
absurdly high. After the third or fourth notice arrives, he comes to recognize
that the bill is actually meant for him, but he's confident there's been some
mistake, and he spends the rest of the book trying to find out what's really
going on.
This quest soon leads to a contact in the bureau named Maud,
with whom Ingvar spends lots of time on the phone—to his delight. He also makes several
visits to bureau headquarters, where executives attempt to demonstrate, using
psychological profiles and a bulging file of data regarding the details of his private
life, that Ingvar's been a lot happier than he thinks over the years. The time
has come to pay up.
Trouble is, Ingvar hasn't got any money. He makes an effort to recall distressing and hitherto overlooked
episodes in hopes of getting his bill renegotiated, but when the facts are fed
into the relevant algorhythms, the invoice
only climbs higher.
There is a certain mild interest to the concept undergirding
this narrative. It raises interesting questions about the degree to which status, money, and
social engagement relate to happiness. But Ingvar's telephone conversations
with his caseworker, Maud, are what keep the story lively. Karlsson weaves in
one or two details from Ingvar's film-watching life to add complexity to this
budding relationship, and it saves the book in a way I wouldn't want to describe
here.
In the end, many readers will remain unconvinced that Ingvar
is really all that happy. If not, then somebody did make a mistake. And in any case, why should someone have to pay
for having been born with a copacetic disposition? Wouldn't it be better to
assign him some sort of community service, considering that money doesn't seem to buy
happiness anyway?
No comments:
Post a Comment