Many people don't realize that going to the Mpls./St. Paul
International Film Festival is not quite the same thing as going to the movies.
That may be because they haven't gone. Or haven't gone enough. Or don't have
friends who go.
Going to the festival is less about story-telling or cinema
aesthetics than about experiencing new elements of life. The festival itself
is a gathering place for people who don't mind asking the stranger standing
next to them in line, "What have you liked? How many have you seen?"
The scheduled films have not been widely reviewed, the
actors are not early candidates for an Oscar nod. The only "buzz"
you'll hear is generated at the festival itself. In choosing from among the
hundreds of films being shown, all you have to go by is word-of-mouth, the
brief and invariably laudatory descriptions in the festival brochure, and your
own predilections.
For three weeks, you enjoy the bustle in the lobby, wait in
the same lines, see the same introductory trailer, and listen to the same
speech about becoming a member delivered over and over again by the "venue
managers," who are usually about twenty years old. After a film you might wander
over to Punch Pizza where they're giving three dollars off to anyone with a
ticket stub. (They used to give you a free pizza!) Between films you might stop
at the nearby Aster Cafe for a drink.
There's a certain pleasure associated with lining up three
films one after another. On what other occasion can you travel to Kazakhstan,
Peru, and Iceland on the same afternoon? If you stretch out your schedule, you'll
see less, but perhaps you'll remember more.
Films that come back to me from previous fests include the
Estonian film Tangerine, the Spanish
film Living Is Easy with Eyes Closed,
the Icelandic film White Night Wedding,
the Jordanian film Thebe (later
short-listed for an Academy Award), the Thai film Agrarian Utopian, the American documentary about Charles Lloyd, the
British film Son of Rambow, the South
African film Twilight Kingdom.
What films will stick in memory from this year? Well, we
were out of town, missed the first week entirely, and ended up seeing only six
or seven films. The range was decent: USA, France, Italy, the Czech Republic, Iraq,
Estonia, Denmark. And consider the contrasts.
Marvelous Boccaccio,
directed by the hallowed Taviani brothers (who also directed Padre Padrone, Night of the Shooting Stars,
and Caesar Must Die), is a retelling
of five tales from Boccaccio's Decameron.
Unlike Pasolini's obscene and unsavory interpretation (1971) this film exhibits
both the elegance of a Botticelli masterpiece and the stately deportment of
Rossellini's Age of the Medici.
Iraqi Odyssey is a
three-hour documentary detailing the history of that sorry nation as seen
through the eyes of one affluent family whose members depart for New Zealand,
Russia, Switzerland, and the USA in the course of time—and sometimes return
home.
The Fencer is a
simple tale of a young Estonian man who was forced to fight with the Nazis when
they occupied his country, and is now being hunting by the Soviets for the same
reason. He's been sent back home by his fencing coach, but is frustrated by the
utterly bored teaching that discipline to the local kids. But it seems they
have talent, and now they've been invited to compete in Moscow ... Should he
take them to the tournament?
Ice and Sky is a
documentary about the man who spent much of his adult life in Antarctica taking
ice core samples to determine the changes the climate the earth has undergone
in the last 40,000 years. There's a lot of good footage of the Antarctic
wastelands, virile scientists drinking brandy and hoofing across the snow, with
an occasional penguin or plane crash thrown in for good measure.
Home Care is about
a woman who works for the Czech health service administering home health care
to an assortment of peculiar people who live nearby. She starts the day with a
shot of slivovitz, drunk straight up in the kitchen alongside her husband, and
moves on from there. There is no plot to speak of, but the woman's depth of hard-headed
industry and maternal compassion contrast starkly with her husband's comical
but also destructive egotism.
In Transit
chronicles three days on an Amtrak train traveling from Chicago to Seattle. We're
on two trains, in fact, following the same route in opposite directions, jostling
back and forth throughout the film from east to west. Along the way we get to
know quite a few of the passengers, many of who have hard luck stories to tell.
Everyone seems to be heading home or escaping from some domestic imbroglio.
It's a little bit dull but also intermittently "real" in a way that
many films aren't. The oil fields of North Dakota figure prominently in the
tale. But of course, there is no "tale."
On the festival's final day, I was planning to see a
comedy-drama from Albania called Bota,
but I got a toothache and went to the dentist instead.
And now that the fest is over, it's time for the rain to stop.
No comments:
Post a Comment