The New York Times reported recently that researchers have discovered significant differences in the
way young people and middle-aged people process information and solve problems.
When young people undertake a cognitive task, the part of the brain they activate
tends to be "highly localize." Older people draw upon a broader
spectrum of cognitive facilities when approaching the same task.
The researchers—who probably wish they were still young, so they
could be doing something more fun than looking at brain scans—have come up with
a perversely inaccurate acronym for this phenomenon: HAROLD. This stands for "hemispheric
asymmetry reduction in older adults." According to the article, most
researchers agree this phenomenon represents "a general reorganization and
weakening of the brain’s function with age."
But is that true? Has it been established scientifically that the
solution arrived at most rapidly, and using the least amount of brainpower, is invariably
the best? Frankly, I think it's more often the other way around. Young people tend to have
plenty of energy, but they often mistake their own tiny corner of the world for
the world itself, and as a result, they make snap judgments that often prove to
be inaccurate and can sometimes be personally harmful.
Older people, tempered and enlightened by such experiences, are much better
at seeing the connections between things, reserving judgment, pondering
alternatives. Due to these qualities, (which, prior to the age of acronyms, went
collectively under the name "maturity") they often become adept at
charting a safe, effective, creative, and reliable course between A and B.
(In the photo above, we see some seasoned adults pondering alternatives: mushrooms laced with truffle-oil, camponata with cocoa powder, prosciutto.)
Rather than burdening older folks with yet another dreadful syndrome,
HAROLD, researchers ought to be studying, and celebrating, HEART—this is, Hemispheric Equilibrium and Reflective
Temper.
(And by the way, did you see the frost on the grass this morning, glistening in the low morning sun?)
(And by the way, did you see the frost on the grass this morning, glistening in the low morning sun?)
On the methodological level, the study once again reminds us that it isn't easy to
design experiments involving the complex tasks that older people typically have
to deal with, where one of the options might be to ignore the task altogether.
(Which reminds me: I still have time to clean out the gutters
before the snow hits!)
So the researchers took the easy way out once again, designing a
simple study focusing on simple tasks. The conclusions were hardly startling: the
elderly subjects who were best at solving simple tasks happened to be in
better shape physically.
(And that reminds me: I haven't been to the gym in a week!)
No comments:
Post a Comment