Travel
writing tends to be a litany of clichés and misapprehensions, but if the prose
is sprightly and the impressions are fresh and vividly rendered, no genre is
more fun to dip into. In any case, if we haven't spent much time in the places involved,
we hardly notice the lack of depth and social insight. What's being described
seems a lot like what we'd probably see if we were there.
Some travel
writers know the regions they're describing well, of course. Lined up on my conceptual
bookshelf of personal favorites are Michael Jacobs' books about Provence and Andalusia,
H. V. Morton's classic descriptions of Italy and Spain, Lawrence Durrell's book
about the Greek islands, and Norman Lewis's books about the Costa Brava and
India.
Recent
classics that leap to mind are Adam Gopnick's Paris to the Moon, Ian Frazier's
Great Plains, Chris Stewart's Driving
Over Lemons, Tom Piazza's Why New
Orleans Matters, and Robert Sullivan's Cross
Country.
When foreigners
come this-a-way to offer their analyses of American life, things get a little
dicier. Everyone quotes the nineteenth-century French observer Alexis de Tocqueville,
and with good reason. Many have followed in his footsteps, Bernard Henry-Levy being among the most
recent I can recall.
But
modern-day visitors from abroad tend to search out the freak shows and truck
stops, ghettos and reservations, Portlandias and Peorias. I guess that's where
the stories are. But is that "America"?
On a Greek
ferry heading to Santorini I once struck up a conversation with a young Swiss
couple who'd been traveling the world.
"Are
the small towns of America genuinely interesting?"
the man asked me, with a good-natured but doubtful look on his face.
I thought
for a moment before replying, "Not really."
Hey? What
about Oxford, Mississippi? Taos, New Mexico? Point Reyes Station, California?
Thermopolis, Wyoming? Cedar Rapids, Iowa? Price, Utah? Bayfield, Wisconsin?
Bardstown, Kentucky? Stonington, Maine? Ste. Genevieve, Missouri? Durango,
Colorado?
Yeah, well,
you've got a lot of driving ahead of you.
* * *
The New York Times recently commissioned Norwegian
novelist Karl Ove Knausgaard to take a driving trip from l'anse aux meadows in Newfoundland
to Alexandria, Minnesota (the home of the Kensington Runestone) and write about the experience. It must have been a spur-of-the-moment commission, because
Knausgaard didn't have time to do the slightest bit of research. In fact, he
didn't even have time to renew his driver's license. I wouldn't have expected
the rugged, chain-smoking Norwegian to make excuses, but he blames it all on a
stressful Christmas.
As a travel
piece, Knausgaard's account is worth little. He knows nothing and he sees
nothing. His only connections to America seem to be musical—the blues and Kid
Rock. He's read the Icelandic sagas but even when staring at archaeological
remains of the Vikings' presence in North America he can't shake the notion
that the tales are literary fabrications.
Knausgaard
did go to the trouble to look up the Kensington Runestone, allegedly left by
Vikings in what is now western Minnesota back in the fourteenth century. But
it's evident he didn't read much of the Wikipedia entry he consulted. He seems
to think they arrived in the Red River Valley by way of Cleveland.
" If the Vikings really had
left their settlements up in Newfoundland and explored the continent by
following the rivers and lakes westward, as the Kensington Runestone’s presence
in Minnesota suggested, it was in a world completely different from the one we
drove through. [Really?
No shopping malls in fourteenth-century America?] I tried to imagine it, tuning out the sounds of the highway, the speed
of the car, the concrete and the steel, but the place I then envisioned, a
landscape untouched by man, was far too romantic to be true."
Though Knausgaard
is shy and doesn't like talking to strangers (not a good trait for a travel
writer, I'm afraid) he finally connects with a long-lost cousin in North Dakota.
From there it's a short jaunt down the freeway to Alexandria and the runestone
museum.
He feels
nothing in the presence of the stone itself, though he delivers the best line
in the 20,000-word essay in response to it.
"I walked around it a few
times, noticing that the inscription ran on, around one side. The runic
inscriptions I had seen earlier, back home, were all short and pithy, whereas
this was practically a novella."
But his
response to the museum is entirely different.
The striking thing was how modest
it all was, how insignificant the objects that were meant to represent the
country’s entire momentous history turned out to be. How clumsily the paintings
illustrating the various epochs were made. How awkward the overarching Viking
theme was, from the winged helmet of the giant statue outside that beckoned to
visitors, to the attempts to substantiate the theory that the Vikings actually
came here, before any other Europeans, in the 14th century.
Yes, there was something homespun
and makeshift and, frankly, childish about the whole thing.
And I loved it.
Knausgaard
loved the museum because it cut America down to size. Though it was promoting a
myth, it was a little one, and not the grand myth of America's exceptionalism. And
it was promoting that little myth with domestic artifacts hardly different from
the ones Knausgaard grew up amid.
It was liberating to see how small
and insignificant each separate part of this history was, compared with our
notions about [America's] grandness. It felt liberating, because that is what
the world is really like, full of insignificant trifles that we use to blunder
on as best we can, one by one, whether we happen to be 19th-century immigrants
building a log cabin in some forest glade, cold and miserable, longing to sit
motionless for a few hours in front of the fire; or a local museum director in
a Norwegian children’s sweater; or a crafty Swede, carving runes into a stone
and burying it in a field in an attempt to change world history.
Knausgaard
had blundered on across America, taking baby steps and smoking cigarettes and
looking out the window of a car he was reluctant to drive—because it had an
automatic transmission! His observations are too often self-referential and
almost invariably banal, but an element of defiant honesty somehow saves him in
the end.
Last on his list of trifles that make up the life we live is "an inept Norwegian writer who has spent 10 days on assignment in the U.S. without discovering anything, apart from this."
Last on his list of trifles that make up the life we live is "an inept Norwegian writer who has spent 10 days on assignment in the U.S. without discovering anything, apart from this."
* * *
Though
I'm hardly an expert on Scandinavian-America travelogues, a few titles I've
found illuminating over the years are On the Viking
Trail: Travels in Scandinavian America, by Don Lago; Knut Hamsun Remembers America: Essay and Stories; and The Unknown Swedes: a Book About Swedes and
America, Past and Present by Vilhelm Moberg.
No comments:
Post a Comment