National Poetry Month slipped by largely unnoticed—at least
by me. Maybe the dearth of spring-like blossoms and gurgling freshets had
something to do with it.
I was intrigued by a post about poetry readings that
appeared on Facebook recently.
The title was I Don’t Get Poetry Readings. (You can read the
article here.)
In the course of the piece, the author made it clear that indeed,
she doesn’t “get” what poetry readings are about, or what poetry itself is
about. No doubt many readers find themselves in the same position, which is based less on a critical insight than a cognitive deficiency.
The piece is lackadaisically written, as if there were a
kind of honesty in not trying too hard. It shifts back and forth in focus from poetry
readings to poetry itself at random, mixing casual observations and clever
quotes which, more carefully examined, would clarify the situation in an
instant.
For example, early on in the piece the author cites a remark
from a recent film:
“Poetry is a very stupid thing to be good at. Poems are basically like dreams–something that everybody likes to tell other people but nobody actually cares about when it’s not their own. Which is why poetry is a failure of the intellectual community.”
There is a sliver of truth to this remark, though we should
note the inclusion of the word “basically.” Yes, poems are basically like dreams—though often they’re better. Those who are
good at writing them hold our attention and make us want to hear the dream
again. Perhaps we don’t “get” poems, but we like them, care about them, feel
the need to make them a part of our lives, and rely on them, even, for strength
or comfort or insight. It’s as simple as that.
The question remains, Why go to a poetry reading? On the one
hand, such events sustain poetry as a cult of initiates and novices, renowned
writers loaded with grants and youthful wannabees with crumpled envelopes in their pockets covered
with verse. Yet poetry is part of the world, and the women and
men who write it have bodies, voices, personalities that come across no less
strongly in person than on the printed page. Sometimes more so.
I heard Andrei Codrescu read his poetry at the downtown Minneapolis library recently. I had always considered him a talented and stimulating writer
but also a crass and often superficial social critic. Hearing him read added elements
of pathos, bitterness, humor, and self-mockery to the picture, making him a
more humane and interesting figure.
And such is often the case.
Besides, readings are usually free, and there’s cake or wine. You see
old friends sometimes, and joy is in the air. It's a public display of craziness, music, and that higher thing we all catch inklings of from time to time. All of this is quite different from reading a book.
My personal gripe against
readings is that they’re too long. After all, a single poem can resonate in
memory for half an hour. Three or four in a row threaten to deaden our
appreciation. Hence, the patter between poems is always welcome. Reading a poem
twice can also be a good idea—though risky.
No comments:
Post a Comment