No sooner have I written this title than I see that it's
inadequate. The word "science" is a kindergarten word. What follows
is a description of books about three men who were deeply interested in the
world around them. But that, too, is inaccurate. What we have here is three books, two of
which were written by insatiably curious men about other men in the past that have
stimulated their interest because these men, too, were inordinately adept at
examining and appreciating the wonders they observed all around them. These two
books are accompanied by a third which describes the journey by an individual who
was similarly inspired by his surroundings to describe the path he followed to
pursue his dream of examining that world in greater depth.
It might also be worth mentioning that all three books have
a worldly or even cosmic scope, but also a regional focus. Seb Falk, who
teaches at Cambridge, writes about discoveries in the library there and the
lives of monks at nearby Bury St. Edmunds. (check) Hugh Aldersey Williams, a
resident of Norwich, writes about the city's most famous son, Sir Thomas
Browne, and Gary Fildes writes about his
own development as a budding amatuer astronomer in the depressed Northumberland
town of Sunderland.
But enough about the inadequacy of titles.
In
The Light Ages,
Seb Falk introduces us to the world of medieval science by means of a single
discovery. In December
1951 a young
Cambridge researcher named Derek Price opened a manuscript lacking a title page
but catalogued as an instruction manual for constructing an astrolabe, perhaps five
hundred years old. He found something quite different. Instead of a manual
written in Latin he found a work written in middle English and dated 1392 on
every page describing an astronomical device far more complex than an
astrolabe.. Geoffrey Chaucer had written a book on a similar subject just a
year earlier, and there were grounds for suspecting that he had written this
one, too.
As it turned out, Chaucer was not the author, but Falk makes
a good story out of following the life of Brother John of Westwyk, the monk who
did actually write it. He succeeds in clarifying the importance of such
astronomical devices in an age that lacked firmly established calendars, but
more than that, he recreates the world of monks, monasteries, universities, and
daily life in medieval England without drawing undue attention to the religious
elements involved. And considering how murky that age seems to most of us, Falk
does a remarkable job a describing the era on its own terms, rather than as a
half-baked preamble to more modern scientific discoveries and principles. Hence
the book's title. Not the Dark Ages, but the Light Ages.
"On Westwyk's journey through medieval science [he writes] we will meet a fascinating
cast, none of them household names. The Spanish Jew- turned-Christian who
taught a Lotharingian monk about eclipses in Worcestershire; the clock-building
English abbot with leprosy; the French craftsman-turned-spy; the Persian
polymath who founded the world's most advanced observatory. Medieval science
was an international endeavour, just as science is today. Religious belief
spurred scientific investigation, but deeply devout people had no problem with
adopting theories from other faiths. .. Watching how one individual knew what
he knew will help us understand the ways medieval thinkers built on each other's
work and influenced other scholars working in different languages thousands of
miles away."

Falk has enormous enthusiasm for
the astronomical principles that Westwyk and others put to use in constructing
their time-keeping and navigational devices, and he tries his best to pass that
on to us. The book is also amply illustrated with diagrams full of azimuths,
zeniths, ascensions,
and astrological
signs. But this material, while central to the narrative, is perhaps the book's
least interesting element. After all, few of us will ever use an astrolabe,
much less build one for our own use. But equally vivid are Falk's descriptions
of daily life, social organization, crusades, plagues, medical lore, international
development and exchange, and other more or less incidental stuff. We lose
track of Westwyk and other characters for pages and sometimes chapters at a
time, in part because longs stretches of his life have left no record, but also
because Falk in intent on fleshing out the material required to help us
understand the broader scene. The book carries all the fascination of Evan S.
Connell at his best, but with boyish enthusiasm in place of Connells often
mordant humor.
Hugh Aldersey-Williams embarks on
a similar mission in The Adventures of
Sir Thomas Browne in the 21st Century. His focus is ostensibly narrower—the
writings of a single seventeenth-century physician and essayist mentioned in
the title. But Browne wrote about so many things that Aldersey-Williams has his hands full examining even a
representative sampling. In any case, his intent is not to convince us of how
modern Browne was, but rather, to introduce us to his life and work, and also
to suggest that quite a few of Browne's beliefs and speculations, which may
seem odd or out-of-date or simply wrong at first glance, offer surprising
parallels to the practices and uncertainties of our own time.
Aldersey-Williams
begins his essay with a narrative of a
dramatic witch trial during which Browne was called upon to testify as an
expert witness. Browne offered his opinion as a physician that the fits and
other symptoms exhibited by the two allegedly "bewitched" children
were natural. But he went on to say, "gratuitously" in Aldersey-Williams'
view, that this very naturalness was "evidence of the subtilty of the
devil, who was controlling the witches actions." This comment likely
contributed to the conviction and death of the two women accused of bewitching
them.
Why did Browne add that remark? Aldersey-Williams
doesn't know, but he takes the episode
as emblematic of Browne's often maddening equivocations and seeming
indifference to the resolution of vital questions of the day. Like Montaigne in
southwest France at an earlier date, Browne wrote during a period of intense
religious and political strife, though you'd hardly know it by reading him.
Alongside his career as a
physician, Browne took and interest in, and wrote about, many aspects of
natural history, in the spirit, not of exact science, but of curiosity. Aldersey-Williams
organizes these ruminations into
categories such as Plants, Tolerance, Melancholy, Faith, and Science, one
chapter per subject. Within each category there is room for a wide variety of
observations and musings, both on Browne's part and on that of his later-day
biographer. The two are equal partners, in fact, and Aldersey-Williams'
reflections are a vital part of the "dialogue."
For example, Aldersey-Williams opens the chapter titled "Physic"
with the case of a 102-year-old bulimic woman that Browne is treating. Browne,
after describing the woman's condition and indulging in a digression that takes
him through one of Plutarch's anecdotes, concludes: "though I am ready to
afford my charity unto her, yet I should be loth to spend a piece of ambergris
I have upon her, and to allow six grains to every dose till I found some effect
in moderating her appetite; though that be esteemed a great specific in her
condition."
Aldersey-Williams acknowledges that it's easy to dismiss the
medical practices of Browne's day as "insufferably primitive," yet he
also notes striking parallels to modern attitudes and techniques.
"It is in its way a thoroughly modern encounter. Browne displays
curiosity and compassion. He is alert to a possible connection between the
woman's medical condition and her environmental circumstances. The medicine is
unusual but like all medicines at this time it is naturally sourced rather than
made artificially (ambergris is a fatty accretion ejected from the stomachs of
sperm whales and could be found floating on the sea or lying on the coast).
Browne has a clear idea of its specific effectiveness, and is aware that dosage
is an important factor. He is also conscious that medicine costs money, that he
must husband his resources in order to run his medical practice at a profit,
and that attention given to a 102-year-old may not, in the end, be, as today's
euphemism has it,' optimal resource allocation'."
The author goes on the observe what everyone who's been
to the doctor knows: today's medical practice also leaves a lot to be
desired. He describes a recent visit to
a GP due to a stomach bug. "I am out in under ten minutes clutching a prescription
for some opioid that will address my symptoms and a mild bewilderment at the
doctor's lack of curiosity about the cause of my illness." The doctor also
mentions antibiotics, but leaves it to Aldersey-Williams to observe that no infecting bacterium has
been identified, and the drugs would be unlikely to be effective. The doctor
then asks Aldersey-Williams if he wants
a referral, without specifying what it would be for. "At the end I feel as
if I have been played," he concludes, "and that he has had me labeled
all along as one of the 'worried well'."
One of Browne's greatest claims to
fame is as the inventor of new words. More than seven hundred neologisms have
been attributed to him. Though many have since fallen from common use, a short
list of his more durable creations (copied from Wikipedia) would include ambidextrous,
antediluvian, analogous, approximate, ascetic, anomalous, carnivorous,
coexistence, coma, compensate, computer, cryptography, cylindrical, disruption,
electricity, exhaustion, ferocious, follicle, generator, gymnastic,
hallucination, herbaceous, holocaust, insecurity, indigenous, jocularity,
literary, locomotion, medical, migrant, mucous, prairie, prostate, polarity,
precocious, pubescent, therapeutic, suicide, ulterior, ultimate and
veterinarian. Aldersey-Williams devotes
some time on this aspect of Browne's genius, but finds the task daunting, and
soon decides to highlight one or two here and there as they appear in the text
with extended notes at the bottom of the page. Good idea.
In the chapter on Animals, Aldersey-Williams
draws from the text of Browne's work Psuedodoxia Epidemica to create an
impromptu bestiary that includes the ostrich, the bittern, the owl, the sperm
whale, the mole, and the badger, among other creatures. Because the book from
which the material is drawn is devoted to what Browne calls "vulgar
errors," these two-page entries are more odd than accurate or informative.
For example, in Browne's day many people thought the legs of a badger were
shorter on one side than the other, because these creatures were often seen
running rapidly down the furrows of a plowed field. Browne rejects this thesis, not by examining
a badger or a badger skeleton, but on the strength of inductive reasoning: the
legs of all other animals are the same on both sides. If a badger were
differently construed, it would, in Browne's words, be "repugnant unto the
course of nature."
Aldersey-Williams is disappointed by Browne's conventional line
of reasoning in this case. A more Brownian solution would have been to capture
a badger, chain him to a tree, and measure his speed going clockwise and then
counterclockwise around it. If the times differed, it would "prove"
that the animals legs were not the same
length on either side.
Such flashes of whimsy appear
through the books. Yet it's clear that Aldersey-Williams knows the man he calls his "hero"
inside and out, and has read and absorbed even the driest and least interesting
of Browne's works, thus saving us the trouble. I've poked my nose into Browne's
Religio Medici, his Urne Burial, and one or two other works
with interest—the era, the style, the mood, the quizzical intelligence come
through—but when push comes to shove, Aldersey-Williams' book is more
stimulating, thought-provoking, and fun to read by far.
An Astronomer's Tale: a Life Under the Stars, is a simpler book.
Its author, Gary Fildes, grew up in a working-class home and began his
professional career as a brick-layer. He went to soccer matches with his
"mates" and brawled with fans of the opposing team almost by
instinct. But he harbored a secret love for the night sky that was nurtured by family
and a neighbor with similar interests, and a good telescope. This is the story
of how Fildes, with tireless enthusiasm but no formal training in astronomy, guilelessly
pursued his interests and eventually became director of the Kiedler Observatory
in Northumberland, a public institution that's located in one of the world's
most spectacular dark-sky havens.
Fildes isn't a researcher or even
an expert astronomer; he's an educator. His passion for watching the night sky
is evident on every page, and every chapter is punctuated with a section
describing the night sky at a given time of year and focusing on a specific
constellation. The book chronicles Fildes' extraordinary rise in the field of
science education, which surprised him as much as anybody else, in terms designed to encourage others to do
the same. Or at the very least, to do a bit of reading, then find a dark place,
and stand in awe of the heavens in the midst of which we go about our daily lives.