Saturday, October 24, 2020

Fall Birding

 


Fall birding is a different kettle of fish.

You don't expect to see much, because there won't be much there

and you've already seen a lot anyway.

A few flashy warblers? Let's face it: none.

I would like to have seen a golden eagle or a goshawk at Hawk Ridge.

It could happen. But no such luck.

We did see a pipit on the sidewalk in front of the Java Moose in

Grand Marias.  Equally good. Haven't seen one in ages.

Birding is an act of unexpected sensuous immediacy, but lurking in the underbrush

is the desire to see something new—for this year, at least.

The fox sparrows have been moving through the yard. They scrape vigorously

amid the leaves, and I know what they're thinking:

"This would be a lot easier if I had arms."

The distinctive call of the white-throated sparrow

is now a feeble, half-hearted whistle. But give him credit:

he's the only one still trying.

We drove down to the river this morning—the Old Cedar Avenue Bridge.

Lots of geese and coots, with trumpeter swans in the distance.

A young birder standing nearby helped us locate a few pintails

on the fringe of the cattails a hundred yards upriver.

Elegant birds.  It's been years since I saw one.

"There are some pied-billed grebes nearby," I said.

"How can you tell?" he said. "They all look like coots."

"Longer neck, lower in the water, squarish head, comically proud. Often alone.

And maybe you can see a little crook in the beak."

"Oh yeah. I see him."

We thanked each other for the tips.

The visit concluded with a smattering of sparrows

flitting here and there through the underbrush, and

a cluster of green-winged teal amid the mallards

in a backwater near the trail.

Then a stop at Patrick's Bakery for croissants and coffee

in a backwater east of Southdale.

Apartment buildings everywhere.

Geese flying overhead.   

Monday, October 19, 2020

North Shore Getaway


The North Shore is always an inviting prospect, though during the summer months it's often thick with tourists (like us). But Hilary's brother told us about a house in the woods above Caribou Lake, a few miles east of Lutsen, that he and his wife, Mary, had booked for five days in late July. We took a look at the website. Though it was a few notches above our normal price range, it looked very nice. The first available dates, however, were in mid-October. Not a bad thing, either. We booked it, telling ourselves we needed a few things to look forward to once the cold weather set in. 

The drive up was windy but uneventful. The lunch line at the Northern Waters Smokehaus on Lake Avenue in Duluth was too long, and we were content to eat some take-out ribs from Famous Dave's, right across the street, while watching the choppy water in the inner harbor from the comfort of a parking lot out on Park Point. 

Ten pine siskins feeding in a tree

The raptor traffic up on Hawk Ridge was negligible due to the high winds. No matter. We went for a walk along the waterfront in Two Harbors and came upon a huge flock of pine siskins, feeding furiously amid the cones high up in a clump of spruce trees. 


We pulled in to our "cabin" (actually a house) a few minutes after the 4 p.m. check-in time, and I almost immediately spotted two grouse feeding on berries or buds twenty feet up in a tree, off in the woods but directly in front of the window. We set up two plastic Adirondack chairs on the shore of the lake and watched the fading sunlight streak across the clouds on the far side of the bay. 


The stars that night were intense, riveting. We felt lucky to be seeing them, knowing that gray weather was likely to be moving in overnight. 


Morning light was gray. We got out into the day early, driving a few miles up the shore to Cascade State Park. One car in the parking lot. Hiking up along the west side of the river, we come upon the first falls almost immediately. Each North Shore river has its own distinctive character—Gooseberry, Temperance, Baptism, Little Marais—and for me the Cascade River possesses the most Asian feel, perhaps because the wooden bridges seem ancient and the overhanging cedars evoke the mood of Chinese scroll paintings. 

Cold air in the lungs, pine scent in the nostrils, we moved up the trail above the fast-moving water. We passed no one during our hike other than a single grouse who was in no hurry to remove himself from the path. 

We spent the rest of the day inside, playing cribbage, listening to the gentle rain on the metal eaves of the house, and reading. I found myself reviewing a paperback introduction to Greek thought, focusing my attention, for no reason that I can think of now, of Aristotle's concept of God as the unmoved mover. The author, Guthrie, does his best to make the idea sound attractive. 
The conception of God as unmoved—or unchanging— and pure form, unsatisfactory as it remains, for several reasons, to the religious mind, is not quite so cold and static as it appears at first sight. As pure actuality he is, though exempt from kinesis, eternally active with an activity which brings no fatigue but is forever enjoyable. His essential quality is life.
It follows that God's activity is to think his own universal perfection. Guthrie continues: 
Wrapped in eternal self-contemplation, he calls forth by his mere presence the latent powers of nature, which strive in their various ways to achieve form and carry out their proper activities, thus imitating in their own particular spheres the one pure form and eternally active being. God does not go out to the world, but the world cannot help going out to him. That is their relationship, summed up in another pregnant phrase: ‘He moves as the object of desire.’ 
Something to ponder as the fresh fish we bought in Duluth are frying in the pan. 

I was less taken with the views expressed by translator David Hinton in his new book, Awakened Cosmos: The Mind of Classical Chinese Poetry. I own quite a few of Hinton's translations. They're good. Here he tries to take us deeper, reproducing the Chinese characters to illustrate how unlike Western sentence construction the Chinese original often is. This is interesting up to a point, but the result is that time and again Hinton suggests that the clear and vivid images we often find (and love) in Tang poetry actually refer to a deeper Taoist truth, which he describes in the introduction as follows:
The concepts of Absence and Presence are simply an approach to the fundamental nature of things. In the end, of course, they are the same: Presence grows out of and returns to Absence and is therefore always a manifestation of it. Or to state it more precisely, Absence and Presence are simply different ways of seeing Tao: either as a single formless tissue that is somehow always generative, or as that tissue in its ten thousand distinct and always changing forms. 
But consider these lines: 
Amid spring mountain, alone, I set out to find you. 
Axe strokes crack-crack, and quit. Quiet mystery deepens. 
Hinton devotes almost a page of analysis to the phrase "quiet mystery deepens." He tells us that the Chinese character actually means “quiet solitude.” and admits that such a reading would be "sufficient as a description of the empty-mind opened by the perceptual clarity of his walk." But Hinton wants to dig deeper.
Appearing often in recluse poetry,[the idiogram] infuses the surface meaning “quiet solitude” with rich philosophical depths, beginning with the sense of “dark /  secret / hidden / mystery”; and that leads finally to the term's deepest level, which animates the whole cosmological process of tzu-jan. Here it means forms, the ten thousand things, barely on the not-yet-emergent side of the origin-moment: just as they are about to emerge from the formless ground of Absence, or just after they vanish back into that ground." 
He continues on in this vein for thirteen lines, using phrases such as "all-encompassing generative present" and "occurrence burgeoning steadily forth." All of this totally obscures, for me at any rate, the experience being described—the sound of wood being chopped, which, when it ceases, leaves us hearing the silence, wondering if the chopping will recommence and then becoming aware of ourselves, out in the woods as time passes, focused on a sound we do not hear, on nothing. Or everything? Or the nothing of everything? 

The phrase "quiet mystery" is entirely adequate to the occasion; anything more ruins the effect. 

At one point in the afternoon we walked down to the lake for a breath of fresh air. It had started to snow, tiny white crystals, well-spaced, dry, and harmless, almost like laundry detergent shaken from a box. 
------- 

Hilary woke me up at 3 the next morning. "John. The stars are out!" We went out onto the deck in pajamas and slippers, crunching across a fine layer of snow. The big dipper was there above the bare branches of a clump of aspens. The Pleiades was now overhead and Cygnus was riding the Milky Way. Within half a minute I saw a fine shooting star streak down toward the horizon, leaving a glowing tail.

And then I chose a star, any star, and tried to convince myself that was real, a burning orb at an unfathomable distance; that the space that separated us was real. In my mind's eye, I even attempted to step to the side to "get some perspective" on that distance, as if I were looking across a landscape at a distant rise and trying to imagine how long it would take to walk there. And suddenly the universe takes on dimension, if only for a few seconds. The vast spaces in between. The perspective is far from accurate but it's awesome just the same. Vertiginous. That's the effect I was looking for, beyond the canopy of pinholes, beyond the badly shaped mythological figures, fatalistic and frightening, yet also invigorating: the depths of space, summoning a primitive, cleansing frisson. 

A few hours later we were up again and plotting the day's activities. The cabin lies only a few hundred yards from the Superior Hiking Trail, and we'd always presumed we'd head west along that trail to Agnes Lake and beyond during out visit. But we've done that hike before. It's basically a walk through deep woods, which would be shaded and perhaps muddy. So we decided to focus on two hikes near Grand Marais that were new to us, and more likely to include stretches of open country. 

On a frigid Thursday morning in October, the town of Grand Marias is quiet. Yet the line in front of the World's Most Famous Donut Shop was still too long for our liking. We parked nearby and walked back to the Java Moose for coffee, but it was closed. We watched an American pipit hop around on the sidewalk in front of the cafĂ© for a few minutes. That was a treat! 

And the coffee at the local co-op was just fine. Whenever we shop there—or at any co-op—I feel I'm part of a sacred guild. Not one of the inner circle, perhaps. But we do have a number at the Wedge. The New Age magazines on sale next to the cash register look ridiculous. I wouldn't want to buy one. But I sort of believe in it. Love, peace, happiness.


Our first hike took us to the top of Sweetheart Bluff. The trailhead is located in the municipal campground, which I had always considered the antithesis of genuine North Woods experience. (But as we drove through the grounds I noticed they have a number of pretty nice tent sites near the lake.) The hike was easy and the views of Grand Marais Harbor from the broad slab of open rock at the top were fine. The vegetation was moist, the sun was coming in low, and the colors were rich.

Along the way we ran into a woman who was visiting her brother in the local hospital. "My kids say I'm hippying it," she said. "I'm sleeping in my van."
 
"It was sort of a cold night," I said vaguely. 

"Don't I know it. I was freezing," she said. "I'm going to buy another sleeping bag today." 

"Try the Ben Franklin," I said. "They have everything." 


But that hike was merely a prelude to our next venture—a two-mile hike through the woods to Pincushion Mountain. The trail starts at the cross-country skiing lot at the top of the rise behind Grand Marias. It's basically flat, and the numerous stretches of boardwalk along the route look to be almost brand-new. After an hour of easy walking you come to an enormous whale-like lump of rock erupting from the forest—many times larger than Carleton Peak, for example. After scrambling thirty feet up the face of the rock, you find yourself on a sunny, windy expanse dotted here and there with individual trees. The seaward view is magnificent, but the inland view is staggering.


On our drive home the next morning we made an impromptu stop at Caribou Creek, which may be the niftiest half-mile hike on the North Shore. The parking lot used to be treacherous, especially in winter. The driveway dropped precipitously from the highway, and when it was packed with snow there was no telling where you'd end up on the way down. Meanwhile, there was no place to alight on the way up before careering out onto the highway.

Someone has fixed all that, and the entry is now handsomely landscaped and perfectly level. The hike up to the gorge is easy, and the gorge itself is impressive. But what moved me most on this occasion was the grouse Hilary spotted on the way up--our seventh of the trip. It stood stock still as we watched it through binoculars. Photographs can hardly do justice to the richness of its varied markings. The back of the neck has an Escher-like checkerboard complexity that becomes more subtle and featherly lower down, while the flanks are marked with bold black stripes. As I looked at its array of features in the soft early-morning light, I said to myself, "That's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen."

   

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

The Club

 At a time when it's become more difficult for us to make use of that "third space" in social life between work and home—the gym, the bar, the restaurant, the church—readers may find it worthwhile to spend some time at one of the most eminent gathering places of the eighteenth century. I'm referring to that social group known to its members as simply The Club. Unlike most gentleman's clubs in eighteenth-century London, the Club had neither a fancy name nor membership dues nor a building to call its own. It met every Friday at the Turk's Head Tavern, and it's members had no other thought in mind than to dine, drink, and converse until midnight and beyond.

What makes it worthy of our attention is its roster, which included eminent men from several walks of life. Alongside the two men who founded the club—painter Sir Joshua Reynolds and man of letters Samuel Johnson—it included such luminaries as economist Adam Smith, playwright Richard Sheridan, historian Edward Gibbon, actor David Garrick, and statesman Edmund Burke. James Boswell, whose Life of Johnson has long since become a classic, was also a member, and he also figures prominently in the narrative.

The book is vastly informative and also a pleasure to read, though readers ought to be forewarned about what kind of a history lies in store. The Club is not an intellectual history of the type that evaluates the contributions made by the individuals involved to the advancement of their respective disciplines, on the order of How the Scots Invented the Modern World. Nor is it a social history, describing the changing tastes, norms, and mores of the era as exemplified by these collegial but disparate men. And strange to say, very little of the book is taken up with reproducing or imaginatively reconstructing conversations that might have taken place at the Turk's Head.

What Damrisch gives us is a series of "brief lives," highlighting the moments when those lives intersect but also delving amply into the meat of each individual story, while making no claim to originality with respect to determining the significance of any of them. Yes, The Rivals and She Stoops to Conquer are funny plays. Yes, The Wealth of Nations is a landmark work of economic theory. Yes, The Decline and Fall had a profound effect on how people of the time thought about Christianity. But Damrosch seems more interested in the love lives, the dining room bon mots, and the rising (and falling) fortunes of his protagonists than in the abiding relevance of their masterworks.

The "star" around which the narrative unfolds is Samuel Johnson.

Samuel Johnson

But that star is a binary star, because much of what we know about Johnson's private life and career comes to us by way of the exhaustive journals of his young and sycophantic friend  James Boswell. Nowadays no one but an academic is likely to be reading Johnson's picaresque moral tale Rasselas, or his Lives of the Poets, or even his once-famous dictionary. His fame depends largely on the portrait drawn of him by Boswell in his Life of Johnson. By all accounts Johnson was an argumentative but tender-hearted curmudgeon who lived in poverty, suffered from depression, was unhappily married to an opium addict, and spent as much time as he could away from home. He is well-known for such one-liners as "Read over your compositions, and when you meet a passage which you think is particularly fine, strike it out." Or "Wine gives a man nothing ... it only puts in motion what had been locked up in frost." Or "Whoever thinks of going to bed before twelve o'clock is a scoundrel." Or "Nature has given women so much power that the law has wisely given them very little."

Women do play a significant role in the narrative, prominent among them Hester Thrale, the wife of an enormously wealthy brewer. She invited Johnson and his friends to many lavish dinners and even seems to have acted as a sometime counselor to his nightmares and warden to his most deviant impulses. Also present at these dinners were bluestocking Lady Montague and novelist Fanny Burney, the daughter of pioneering musicologist Charles Burney. Drawing on the private journals of these and other members of the Thrale's social set, Damrosch paints a vivid portrait of a heady social environment in which wealth and social status went hand in hand, as did patronage and artistic reputation. Sir Joshua Reynolds made a fortune painting portraits of the rich; Boswell inherited a fortune; Burke borrowed heavily to maintain the lifestyle of a distinguished MP, and so on.    

Dr. Johnson was never well off himself.  Hence his famous remark: “No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money.” Then again, he also remarked: "Every man is rich or poor according to the proportion between his desires and his enjoyments."

With the passing years more individuals were elected to join the Club, few of them well-known today, and Johnson attended less often, but very little of the book actually focuses on the meetings themselves, and it hardly matters. Damrosch has fashioned a series of lively portraits, and he's included such outliers as the rabble-rouser John Wilkes, philosophers David Hume and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Corsican revolutionary Pasquale Paoli, in the mix. The result is a free-flowing and affectionate essay full of witty remarks, telling anecdotes, and shrewd observations. Damrosch doesn't aim to be comprehensive or deep, but he knows how to weave a complicated tale artfully, and every page of this book is interesting.