
I gave a talk about the publishing industry at a public library south of the river the other day. I’m no expert, but over the years I’ve designed maybe a hundred books, edited fifty, written three … and schlepped millions.
I had anticipated that if anyone actually showed up, they’d probably be writers eager to learn more about how to get their work into print. Partly true. People did show up, but they seemed to be interested in every aspect of the process. Some raised their hands when I asked if anyone in the crowd had ever considered writing a book. Fewer raised their hands when I asked who was actually working on one.
It can boggle the mind to consider that a publisher buys a manuscript from an agent, hires editors, designers, proofers, and perhaps marketers, then sends off the files to a printer. The finished “product” might then go to a distributor who handles “fulfillment,” while also making an effort to get the title into a major warehouse, at which point a bookstore chain might (or might not) agree to order it. A publicist or marketing department sends out ARCs for blurbs and to reviewers, sets up media spots, etc.
None of which can guarantee that a prospective reader will notice the book, and beyond that, actually buy it.
Considering the difficulties involved in finding a publisher for a manuscript, and the Byzantine nature of the production and supply chain, it’s no wonder some attendees were interested in the advances in technology and distribution that fall under the rubric of Print-On-Demand, which sides-steps many of these elements. They asked about production quality, ISBNs, Amazon sales, ebooks, and all the rest. Alongside these reasonable concerns, I tried to bring the issue of “platform” into the discussion, which amounts to trying to get famous before you publish your book.
Such issues are the stuff of countless blogs, and I had nothing original to offer. What I tried to stress is the value of assessing motives when trying to get a book into print. Self-expression? Fame? Wealth? Making the world a better place? Some books are probably best suited to being hand-bound and distributed to relatives and friends. (Like my own choice little hand-bound volume: What Ever Happened to Hegel?, which I showed the class.)
We talked a little about blogs—a cheap and easy way to get your work “out there.” Few read them, perhaps, yet it’s worthwhile, I think, to cross the threshold between private and public thinking from time to time, in any case.One woman told the story of a cattleman who printed a thousand copies of his memoir and gave 800 of them away at cattle auctions as a promotional effort. The book never caught on (or perhaps he’d saturated the market) and they gave the other 200 away at his funeral.
To me that’s a powerful tale of the value of the printed word. I’d like to have a copy myself. Coincidentally, one of the sample “self-published” books I brought along was a book of cowboy verse and sayings that the author, a rancher herself, sells at Cowboy Poetry festivals. Opening it at random during my little seminar, I read:
A cow chip is paradise to a fly.
No one laughed.
We were nearing the end of the lively ninety-minute event when it occurred to me that I had made only brief mention of the role played by an editor in getting a book to market. In retrospect that seems a little strange, considering that I spend quite a bit of my time editing books. The long and short of it is that editors exist—in some situations they’re unavoidable—and they can radically improve the quality of a manuscript.
It depends on the condition of the work to begin with. In some cases, an editor might be compared to a spouse who picks flecks of lint off the author’s tuxedo before he or she steps on stage to deliver a speech. In others, the editor functions as a building inspector, informing the homeowner that the wiring isn’t up to code, the deck needs a safety rail, and the cracked concrete in the sidewalk will have to be replaced. And there are occasions when the editor functions as a counselor, coaxing the author to a fuller realization of what he or she really wants to say. Often it's a combination of all three.
Henry David Thoreau once remarked, “It takes a long time to make a book short.” This could be the mantra of any editor, with the added proviso, “…and costs a lot of money.” But Thoreau also said, “There are probably words addressed to our condition exactly, which, if we could really hear and understand, would be more salutary than the morning or the spring to our lives, and possibly put a new perspective on the face of things for us. How many a man has dated a new era in his life from the reading of a book.”
Herein lies the spirit of the book as a medium of communication, and of communion. There are times when I begin to wonder if the book industry actually serves this spirit, in the midst of all the media hoopla it generates, but I have noticed that the individuals who work for publishers, printers, and retailers almost invariably do love books. It’s only when you add the sales and production issues to the equation that things sometimes get dicey, turn sour, or go awry.
And without those elements, we really wouldn’t have many books on the shelf.
We wouldn’t have much to read.

















