The Minneapolis-St. Paul International Film festival has largely
run its course, for the 44th time, and the Best of the Fest line-up has
been announced. These are films that will be aired again because they were
deemed the best by viewers, though I sometimes wonder if they’re simply the
ones that are currently available to be shown again before moving on to
festivals in Keokuk and Elephant Butte.
Hilary and I saw twelve films and we liked them all. Would we recommend them to friends? Maybe not.
Part of the buzz comes from showing up day after day at the theater, which sits across the
river from downtown Minneapolis. It’s a vibrant scene, and it’s not uncommon
for us to run into longtime friends, casual acquaintances, and film buffs with
whom we’ve chatted at some festival years ago without ever learning their
names. That adds to the fun.
The five-screen theater complex is only fifteen minutes from
our house, and we adopted a new parking strategy this year that made the
approach even easier. Rather the wasting time scouring the neighborhood for an
open spot on the street and worrying about the two-hour time limit, we took to
parking on Marshall Avenue, where there was always a spot available, and
setting off on the ten-minute walk to the theater.
Among the films we saw, several were expertly made and one
was actually gripping. These films might do well in a normal first-run setting.
Others were classic “film-fest” movies: slow to develop, set in exotic locales,
giving you the time to soak up the atmosphere and listen to the crickets chirp.
And then there were the bio-pics and documentaries.

In the first category I would place a Czech film, Waves.
It depicts a few episodes during the Prague Spring of 1968 and the struggles of
the employees of the “official” radio station to broadcast honest news under
the scrutiny of government officials who are always asking themselves, “What
will Moscow think about this?” I won’t be giving away any secrets if I remind
you that five Warsaw Pact countries under Russian leadership invaded
Czechoslovakia in the fall of that year. The film captures the décor of the
era, and also the Western music that had become so popular—for example, the
Shirelles “Be My Baby.” There are plot twists and Russian tanks, heroism and
loyalty and defeat on the streets of Prague. It’s a great mix.
When we got home, we pulled out a copy of A History in
Fragments: Europe in the Twentieth Century,
by Richard Vinen, to fill in the details, but the focus wasn’t quite right. Milan
Kundera’s Book of Laughter and Forgetting offered fewer historical details but was much
better suited to the mood and complexity of the film. And after all, Kundera was
there.
In Meet the Barbarians, a French comedy/drama directed
by Julie Delpy, a small town in Brittany that’s expecting to welcome a refugee Ukrainian
family is surprised to discover that in fact the family that’s arriving from
Syria. It’s a strangely light-hearted film, considering the context, but it
works none the less. I couldn't help thinking of darker films like Green Border and The Old Oak here and there along the way.
A third film in the “polished and ready for prime time”
category, Mistura, was less effective. Here the daughter of the French
ambassador to Peru is humiliated when her husband runs off with a beauty queen.
Facing disgrace and financial ruin, she vents her emotions on the only people still
close at hand—her devoted servants. In the course of the film she recovers her
self-esteem, if not her social status, by means of the one thing she loved to
do before her marriage: cooking. She opens a restaurant with the help of her
father’s former chef (Asian), her trusted chauffeur (black), and a maid
(Latino) who’s served the family for decades.

It's a food movie, among other thing, and the close-ups are appetizing. It’s also a fairy tale of ethnic sharing and cooperation, which is fine by me. But I
didn’t get the sense that our protagonist had really changed all that
much by the end of the film. She had cut back on the stylish clothes and the
heavy make-up, but she was still the boss, and they were the servants.
We'd run into an old friend while waiting in line, and in the lobby after the film she told us, "I lived in Peru for three months when I was in college back in the 70s. It was really like that! Everyone was thinking all the time about what they wore, and what so-and-so would say if they did this or that. You can do this; you can't do that or be seen there."
One thing the chauffeur and the ambassador's daughter have in common is that they can both quote the poet Cesar Vallejo by heart. When we got home I pulled Trilce off the shelf and was soon fast asleep.
The Property follows an elderly woman and her
granddaughter as they travel from Israel to Poland in hope of regaining
ownership of an apartment that was confiscated during the war. Hidden at the
root of this simple endeavor is a pre-war love affair between Jew and goy that
everyone in the family knows about but no one talks about. The film consists of
various appointments in Warsaw and also random meetings with strangers, some of
whom become friends.
Grandmother and granddaughter are pursuing different
strategies and are seldom in the same place at the same time, and their local
cantor, who has ostensibly accompanied them to attend a conference, also
figures in the plot. Several enigmatic elements come together nicely by the
time we’re through. Do they get the apartment? I’m not telling.

The Last Journey details a son’s efforts to rekindle the
spark in his aged father, who has somehow lost his “pep,” by taking him on a
road trip from central Sweden to the French Riviera, where the family enjoyed some
memorable holidays decades earlier. The father seems very feeble, but the son
is bursting with energy and he recruits an old friend to help him make the trip
memorable. Both of the younger men are highly skilled directors and producers
in real life—a fact I only learned after seeing the film. That might explain
how they succeed in cobbling together the funniest and most touching trip—and
film—you can imagine, considering that the old man can hardly walk.
The other engaging comedy we saw, Fun Raiser, is set
half a world way from the Riviera in the depressed mining town of Chisolm,
Minnesota. Crafted by local filmmakers Wyatt McDill (director) and Megan Huber
(producer) and almost obeying Aristotle’s unities of time, place, and action,
it takes place in a single afternoon and evening during which an odd collection
of small-town folk attempt to host a fund-raising event to keep their fledging
art school afloat. A media star with local roots will be arriving from L.A. for
the event, but the money to rent the hall and pay the caterers has fallen
through. If these hapless educators did succeed in holding the event,
and they did raise some money, everything might turn out differently, of
course. The result is a madcap succession of frenzied conversations as we get
the know the characters, none of whom seems to be sure what anyone else is
doing. It’s a rocky start, but (spoiler alert) once the event is moved to a
dilapidated warehouse nearby and the wealthy guests start arriving, the film
reaches what chemists call “activation energy” and (with the help of a gummy
bear or two) it starts to hum with an accelerating rhythm of absurd gags,
hilarious pratfalls, and touching testimonials to the importance of arts
education and its power to unite and inspire even the most down-at-heal
community.

Among the “third-world” films we saw, Regretfully at Dawn
stands out. Set in rural Thailand, it tells the simple story of a girl who’s
being raised by her grandfather on a farm of some sort. They enjoy being
together and get along well. But she’s very bright, and her teacher at the
local school is convinced she should continue her education abroad. Her
grandfather, meanwhile, is ailing a bit, and seems to be enmeshed in memories
of the time he spent in combat years ago—memories that he cherishes. It’s a gentle
film, slow-moving, full of rural expanses, but also punctuated here and there
by sudden explosions.
The most unusual film we saw, I think, was Grand Tour.
The story-line isn’t much: British functionary stationed in Burma (or
somewhere) flees fiancée; woman follows. The fleeing man says almost nothing
and has virtually no distinguishing characteristics. He’s less than a cypher;
he’s merely a prop. He serves the purpose of providing a narrative thread with
which Portuguese director Miguel Gomes can string together exotic footage of
the Far East taken at various times during the twentieth century along with
footage he shot himself, much of it in black and white.

The fiancée shows up halfway through the film, and she’s
much more dynamic. She gives the film a lift. But the entire work carries the
flavor of an old silent film, where the fascinating imagery trumps the odd and
sometimes arbitrary way it’s juxtaposed, like the phrases in a good surrealist poem.
It reminded me of the recent Gods of Mexico, and also a black-and-white
film from Russia that I saw years ago, Bag of Bones. Similarly odd, yet
strangely refreshing.
There are times when a film fest comes to an end, and you
find that you’ve seen three or four films about farming, or arctic exploration,
for no particular reason. This year, we happened to see three biopics. All
good.
I have never read anything by the Irish novelist Edna O’Brien,
but Hilary recently read The Country Girls, and friends told us Blue
Road: The Edna O’Brien Story was well put together. It is. O’Brien comes
across as sharp, honest, playful, curious. The men she associated with less so.
Her two bright and articulate sons add a lot to the story. The petty and
scathing remarks her husband wrote in her journal expose a narcissistic tyrant.
In the course of the film we get to know her, and it’s fun to catch a
few newsreel glimpses of the London party scene, but the film’s richness
derives even more from the atmospheric home movies shot in Ireland.
Flicka, a portrait of the opera singer Frederica von
Stade, is hardly less appealing, and her life followed a similar trajectory, up
to a point. She achieved surprising success at an early age, never took herself
too seriously, and was capable of doing things for the sheer fun of it. The film takes us beyond the obvious talent and success to probe Flicka's irrepressible thoughtfulness and humanity.

Ai Wei Wei’s Turandot gave me a clearer idea of who
this Chinese dissident is. It jumps back and forth from China, where Ai was imprisoned
for his outspoken views, to Rome, where he’s been put in charge of designing a
new production of Puccini’s opera Turandot. Wei envisions the work as a
statement about free speech and repression, and there is undoubtedly an
authoritarian element to the plot. Ai is in his element fashioning costumes of
strange creatures to fill out the scenes, though he's never designed an opera before and admits that he doesn't really like opera. But I’m sure some viewers were eager
to hear a bit more of the music. I know I was.